SemStruct: Contextualizing Semantic Embeddings with Structural Information for Schema Matching

Schema matching is a fundamental step in integrating heterogeneous data sources. While Pre-trained Language Models (PLMs) have revolutionized this task by capturing linguistic semantics, they typically process tabular data as serialized text sequences of standalone column descriptions. This serialization discards critical structural information -- specifically, the row-level co-occurrences, i.e. the relational context -- forcing models to rely solely on column header semantics or standalone distributions. To bridge this gap, we propose SemStruct, a framework that joins the semantic power of frozen PLMs with the structural inductive bias of Graph Neural Networks (GNNs). We model the table as a heterogeneous graph where columns and values are nodes connected by rows, allowing the GNN to propagate disambiguating context across the structure. Unlike other state-of-the-art methods that require proprietary LLM access and fine-tuning of language models, SemStruct keeps the language model frozen and trains only a lightweight structural encoder. Extensive experiments on the Valentine and SOTAB-SM benchmarks demonstrate that SemStruct achieves state-of-the-art performance, outperforming fully fine-tuned baselines on complex, semantically joinable datasets. Furthermore, our ablation studies reveal that row representations serve primarily as topological conduits rather than semantic entities, validating the necessity of explicit structural modeling in schema matching.

Planning in the LLM Era: Building for Reliability and Efficiency

Growing attention to intelligent agents has put a spotlight on one of their central capabilities: planning. Early attempts to leverage large language models (LLMs) for planning relied on single-shot plan generation, followed by hybrid approaches that coupled LLMs with limited external search. These methods, unsound and incomplete by their very nature, often require substantial resources without yielding better solutions on unseen problems. As the limitations of LLMs become clearer, recent work has shifted toward using them at solution construction time -- generating symbolic solvers for a family of problems that can be verified and then used efficiently at inference time. This trend reflects the growing need for agents that are both reliable and resource-efficient. It also offers a path towards generating maintainable planners with minimal dependence on language models at inference time. In this paper, we argue that this shift reflects a broader realignment of the planning field in the LLM era. We examine three major categories of planner-generation methods, discuss their current limitations, and outline research steps towards a more reliable and efficient LLM-based generation of planners.

Towards Universal Tabular Embeddings: A Benchmark Across Data Tasks

Tabular foundation models aim to learn universal representations of tabular data that transfer across tasks and domains, enabling applications such as table retrieval, semantic search and table-based prediction. Despite the growing number of such models, it remains unclear which approach works best in practice, as existing methods are often evaluated under task-specific settings that make direct comparison difficult. To address this, we introduce TEmBed, the Tabular Embedding Test Bed, a comprehensive benchmark for systematically evaluating tabular embeddings across four representation levels: cell, row, column, and table. Evaluating a diverse set of tabular representation learning models, we show that which model to use depends on the task and representation level. Our results offer practical guidance for selecting tabular embeddings in real-world applications and lay the groundwork for developing more general-purpose tabular representation models.

Model Space Reasoning as Search in Feedback Space for Planning Domain Generation

The generation of planning domains from natural language descriptions remains an open problem even with the advent of large language models and reasoning models. Recent work suggests that while LLMs have the ability to assist with domain generation, they are still far from producing high quality domains that can be deployed in practice. To this end, we investigate the ability of an agentic language model feedback framework to generate planning domains from natural language descriptions that have been augmented with a minimal amount of symbolic information. In particular, we evaluate the quality of the generated domains under various forms of symbolic feedback, including landmarks, and output from the VAL plan validator. Using these feedback mechanisms, we experiment using heuristic search over model space to optimize domain quality.

Can AI autonomously build, operate, and use the entire data stack?

Enterprise data management is a monumental task. It spans data architecture and systems, integration, quality, governance, and continuous improvement. While AI assistants can help specific persona, such as data engineers and stewards, to navigate and configure the data stack, they fall far short of full automation. However, as AI becomes increasingly capable of tackling tasks that have previously resisted automation due to inherent complexities, we believe there is an imminent opportunity to target fully autonomous data estates. Currently, AI is used in different parts of the data stack, but in this paper, we argue for a paradigm shift from the use of AI in independent data component operations towards a more holistic and autonomous handling of the entire data lifecycle. Towards that end, we explore how each stage of the modern data stack can be autonomously managed by intelligent agents to build self-sufficient systems that can be used not only by human end-users, but also by AI itself. We begin by describing the mounting forces and opportunities that demand this paradigm shift, examine how agents can streamline the data lifecycle, and highlight open questions and areas where additional research is needed. We hope this work will inspire lively debate, stimulate further research, motivate collaborative approaches, and facilitate a more autonomous future for data systems.

Less is More: Learning Graph Tasks with Just LLMs

For large language models (LLMs), reasoning over graphs could help solve many problems. Prior work has tried to improve LLM graph reasoning by examining how best to serialize graphs as text and by combining GNNs and LLMs. However, the merits of such approaches remain unclear, so we empirically answer the following research questions: (1) Can LLMs learn to solve fundamental graph tasks without specialized graph encoding models?, (2) Can LLMs generalize learned solutions to unseen graph structures or tasks?, and (3) What are the merits of competing approaches to learn graph tasks? We show that even small LLMs can learn to solve graph tasks by training them with instructive chain-of-thought solutions, and this training generalizes, without specialized graph encoders, to new tasks and graph structures.

MiGrATe: Mixed-Policy GRPO for Adaptation at Test-Time

Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly being applied to black-box optimization tasks, from program synthesis to molecule design. Prior work typically leverages in-context learning to iteratively guide the model towards better solutions. Such methods, however, often struggle to balance exploration of new solution spaces with exploitation of high-reward ones. Recently, test-time training (TTT) with synthetic data has shown promise in improving solution quality. However, the need for hand-crafted training data tailored to each task limits feasibility and scalability across domains. To address this problem, we introduce MiGrATe-a method for online TTT that uses GRPO as a search algorithm to adapt LLMs at inference without requiring external training data. MiGrATe operates via a mixed-policy group construction procedure that combines on-policy sampling with two off-policy data selection techniques: greedy sampling, which selects top-performing past completions, and neighborhood sampling (NS), which generates completions structurally similar to high-reward ones. Together, these components bias the policy gradient towards exploitation of promising regions in solution space, while preserving exploration through on-policy sampling. We evaluate MiGrATe on three challenging domains-word search, molecule optimization, and hypothesis+program induction on the Abstraction and Reasoning Corpus (ARC)-and find that it consistently outperforms both inference-only and TTT baselines, demonstrating the potential of online TTT as a solution for complex search tasks without external supervision.

ACPBench Hard: Unrestrained Reasoning about Action, Change, and Planning

The ACPBench dataset provides atomic reasoning tasks required for efficient planning. The dataset is aimed at distilling the complex plan generation task into separate atomic reasoning tasks in their easiest possible form, boolean or multiple-choice questions, where the model has to choose the right answer from the provided options. While the aim of ACPBench is to test the simplest form of reasoning about action and change, when tasked with planning, a model does not typically have options to choose from and thus the reasoning required for planning dictates an open-ended, generative form for these tasks. To that end, we introduce ACPBench Hard, a generative version of ACPBench, with open-ended questions which the model needs to answer. Models that perform well on these tasks could in principle be integrated into a planner or be used directly as a policy. We discuss the complexity of these tasks as well as the complexity of validating the correctness of their answers and present validation algorithms for each task. Equipped with these validators, we test the performance of a variety of models on our tasks and find that for most of these tasks the performance of even the largest models is still subpar. Our experiments show that no model outperforms another in these tasks and with a few exceptions all tested language models score below 65%, indicating that even the current frontier language models have a long way to go before they can reliably reason about planning. In fact, even the so-called reasoning models struggle with solving these reasoning tasks. ACPBench Hard collection is available at the following link: https://ibm.github.io/ACPBench

Can Cross Encoders Produce Useful Sentence Embeddings?

Cross encoders (CEs) are trained with sentence pairs to detect relatedness. As CEs require sentence pairs at inference, the prevailing view is that they can only be used as re-rankers in information retrieval pipelines. Dual encoders (DEs) are instead used to embed sentences, where sentence pairs are encoded by two separate encoders with shared weights at training, and a loss function that ensures the pair's embeddings lie close in vector space if the sentences are related. DEs however, require much larger datasets to train, and are less accurate than CEs. We report a curious finding that embeddings from earlier layers of CEs can in fact be used within an information retrieval pipeline. We show how to exploit CEs to distill a lighter-weight DE, with a 5.15x speedup in inference time.

ACPBench: Reasoning about Action, Change, and Planning

There is an increasing body of work using Large Language Models (LLMs) as agents for orchestrating workflows and making decisions in domains that require planning and multi-step reasoning. As a result, it is imperative to evaluate LLMs on core skills required for planning. In this work, we present ACPBench, a benchmark for evaluating the reasoning tasks in the field of planning. The benchmark consists of 7 reasoning tasks over 13 planning domains. The collection is constructed from planning domains described in a formal language. This allows us to synthesize problems with provably correct solutions across many tasks and domains. Further, it allows us the luxury of scale without additional human effort, i.e., many additional problems can be created automatically. Our extensive evaluation of 22 open-sourced and frontier LLMs highlight the significant gap in the reasoning capability of the LLMs. The average accuracy of one of the best-performing frontier LLMs -- GPT-4o on these tasks can fall as low as 52.50% ACPBench collection is available at https://ibm.github.io/ACPBench.